Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

JMX (a child by his mother and litigation friend, FMX) Claimant - and – Norfolk and Norwich Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2018] EWHC 185 (QB)

Litigation risk, settlement, privileged material

Mr Justice Foskett

Interesting comment on the nature of assessing litigation risk in the context of Part 36 offers and in mediation from a judge who was a mediator.  Mr Justice Foskett said (para 12) the following:

"How one side perceives the risks in a piece of litigation (whether in the clinical negligence sphere or any other sphere) will almost invariably be different from the way the other side perceives them. Quite often in my experience as a practitioner and, more particularly, as a mediator, a settlement of a case was achieved when there were widely differing views of the risks on both sides. Settlement did not require a meeting of minds on the nature of the litigation risks of each side"

At paragraph 18 Foskett J also reiterates the privileged nature of without prejudice negotiations.

More Cases

Subject
Consideration as to whether a failure to respond to an offer to mediate is, in itself, unreasonable conduct which should lead to cost sanctions. Costs awarded to the successful party on an indemnity basis despite failure to mediate.
Subject
Costs decision. Consideration of validity of Part 36 offer and reasonableness of failure to mediate at an earlier stage.
Subject
Indemnity costs ordered on basis that losing party failed to engage with offer to mediate.

accreditations & partnerships